# canfly? - full coverage detail Generated 2026-08-01 from live data. canfly? aggregates the official drone (UAS) geographical zones that EU and EEA states are required to publish under Regulation (EU) 2019/947, Article 15, normalises them to the EASA ED-269 model, and serves them on one map with per-area downloads. The map, the data and the exports are free. ## Summary - **16 of 31** EU/EEA states are live, covering **210,910 zones**. - **8** states are blocked: the data exists, but it is behind a login or its licence forbids redistribution. - **7** states publish nothing machine-readable at all. ## What the statuses mean - **live** - Ingested automatically. - **manual** - Data exists but is behind a login, or its licence forbids us republishing it. - **planned** - Source identified; not yet wired up. - **unavailable** - The state publishes nothing machine-readable. ## Every EU / EEA state | Country | Status | Zones | Publishing authority | Data date | Official source | |---|---|---|---|---|---| | Austria | manual | - | Austro Control (Austria) | - | https://www.dronespace.at/ | | Belgium | manual | - | skeyes (Belgium) | - | https://map.droneguide.be/ | | Bulgaria | live | 881 | Главна дирекция „Гражданска въздухоплавателна администрация“ (CAA Bulgaria) | 2026-07-30 | https://www.caa.bg/bg/category/633/7062 | | Croatia | unavailable | - | Croatia Control (AMC) | - | https://www.crocontrol.hr/ | | Cyprus | live | 141 | Department of Civil Aviation (Cyprus) | 2026-07-31 | https://drones.gov.cy/geo-zones-map/ | | Czechia | live | 115,248 | Řízení letového provozu ČR (ANS CR) / ÚCL | 2026-07-23 | https://dronemap.gov.cz/ | | Denmark | manual | - | Trafikstyrelsen / Naviair (Denmark) | - | https://www.en.droneregler.dk/uas-geographical-zones/data-for-download | | Estonia | live | 225 | Estonian Air Navigation Services (EANS) | 2026-07-31 | https://droonid.eans.ee/ | | Finland | live | 723 | Traficom / Fintraffic ANS (Finland) | 2026-07-31 | https://www.droneinfo.fi/ | | France | live | 89,736 | DGAC / IGN (France) | 2026-07-31 | https://www.geoportail.gouv.fr/donnees/restrictions-pour-drones-de-loisir | | Germany | manual | - | LBA / DFS (dipul) | - | https://www.dipul.de/ | | Greece | unavailable | - | HCAA (Greece) | - | https://hcaa.gov.gr/ | | Hungary | unavailable | - | HungaroControl (Hungary) | - | https://www.hungarocontrol.hu/ | | Ireland | live | 86 | Irish Aviation Authority / AirNav Ireland | 2026-07-25 | https://www.iaa.ie/general-aviation/drones/uas-geographic-zones | | Italy | manual | - | ENAC / d-flight (Italy) | - | https://www.d-flight.it/ | | Latvia | live | 415 | Civil Aviation Agency of Latvia / LGS | 2026-07-31 | https://www.caa.gov.lv/ | | Lithuania | live | 321 | Oro navigacija (Lithuania) | 2026-07-31 | https://www.ans.lt/ | | Luxembourg | live | 47 | Direction de l'Aviation Civile (Luxembourg) | 2026-07-31 | https://drones.geoportail.lu/ | | Malta | unavailable | - | Transport Malta CAD | - | https://www.transport.gov.mt/aviation/drones | | Netherlands | unavailable | - | Rijksoverheid / LVNL (Netherlands) | - | https://www.rijksoverheid.nl/onderwerpen/drone | | Poland | manual | - | PAŻP (Poland) | - | https://dronemap.pansa.pl/ | | Portugal | live | 358 | ANAC - Autoridade Nacional da Aviação Civil | 2026-04-22 | https://dnt.anac.pt/ | | Romania | live | 1,272 | ROMATSA / AACR (Romania) | 2026-07-31 | https://flightplan.romatsa.ro/init/drones | | Slovakia | live | 100 | Dopravný úrad / NSAT (Slovakia) | 2026-05-14 | https://letectvo.nsat.sk/en/unmanned-aviation/geo-zones/ | | Slovenia | live | 130 | Javna agencija za civilno letalstvo RS (CAA Slovenia) | 2026-07-31 | https://www.caa.si/en/geographical-restrictions-for-uas.html | | Spain | manual | - | AESA / ENAIRE (Spain) | - | https://drones.enaire.es/ | | Sweden | manual | - | Transportstyrelsen / LFV (Sweden) | - | https://dronechart.lfv.se/ | | Iceland (EEA) | unavailable | - | Isavia / ICETRA (Iceland) | - | https://www.isavia.is/en/corporate/aviation/drone-flying | | Liechtenstein (EEA) | live | 3 | Covered by the Swiss system (skyguide / FOCA) | 2026-07-31 | https://map.geo.admin.ch/?layers=ch.bazl.einschraenkungen-drohnen | | Norway (EEA) | unavailable | - | Avinor / Luftfartstilsynet (Norway) | - | https://luftfartstilsynet.no/ | | Switzerland (EEA) | live | 1,224 | FOCA / BAZL (Switzerland), data via swisstopo | 2026-07-31 | https://map.geo.admin.ch/?layers=ch.bazl.einschraenkungen-drohnen | ## Why each uncovered state is uncovered The single most useful distinction on this page, and the one most often got wrong. "Not on canfly?" does NOT mean "no data exists": for most of these states the data exists and is good, and what is missing is permission to reuse it. Each has a page of its own. ### Austria - Reason: published, but not licensed for reuse - Authority: Austro Control (Austria) - Official source: https://www.dronespace.at/ - Last verified: 2026-07-27 - Page: https://canfly.io/drone-zones/austria Austro Control publishes Austria's UAS geographical zones as a downloadable ED-269 file through Dronespace, but reserves all rights to it and grants no reuse permission, so we cannot republish it here. Dronespace itself is free to use and is the authoritative check. ### Belgium - Reason: published behind a login - Authority: skeyes (Belgium) - Official source: https://map.droneguide.be/ - Last verified: 2026-07-11 - Page: https://canfly.io/drone-zones/belgium skeyes publishes Belgium's zones through Droneguide, and they can be exported - but only after creating a free account, so there is no open endpoint for us to read. Droneguide is free and is the official check for Belgian flights. ### Croatia - Reason: not published in machine-readable form - Authority: Croatia Control (AMC) - Official source: https://www.crocontrol.hr/ - Last verified: 2026-07-11 - Page: https://canfly.io/drone-zones/croatia Croatia Control publishes drone zones through the login-gated AMC Portal and in the AIP as PDF documents. There is no machine-readable dataset to ingest. (An ArcGIS "UAS GEO ZONES" viewer is often mistaken for Croatia's - it is Slovenia's.) ### Denmark - Reason: published, but not licensed for reuse - Authority: Trafikstyrelsen / Naviair (Denmark) - Official source: https://www.en.droneregler.dk/uas-geographical-zones/data-for-download - Last verified: 2026-07-27 - Page: https://canfly.io/drone-zones/denmark Denmark publishes one of the best drone-zone datasets in Europe - complete, refreshed daily, and free to download - but Trafikstyrelsen's terms state it is for personal use only. That permits you to download it; it does not permit us to republish it on a public map. Get it directly from the official page below. ### Germany - Reason: published, but not licensed for reuse - Authority: LBA / DFS (dipul) - Official source: https://www.dipul.de/ - Last verified: 2026-07-27 - Page: https://canfly.io/drone-zones/germany Germany's zones are published openly by dipul (LBA and DFS) as a public web service - no login, no key - but under a CC BY-ND licence, which forbids derivatives. Converting the German layers into the common EU format this site uses is a derivative, so we cannot show them. dipul.de is free and authoritative, and is where German flights should be checked. ### Greece - Reason: not published in machine-readable form - Authority: HCAA (Greece) - Official source: https://hcaa.gov.gr/ - Last verified: 2026-07-11 - Page: https://canfly.io/drone-zones/greece The HCAA publishes Greek drone zones as a map viewer only - images served to a browser, with no downloadable dataset behind them - and the underlying service is licensed non-commercial, no-derivatives. Check the HCAA viewer directly. ### Hungary - Reason: not published in machine-readable form - Authority: HungaroControl (Hungary) - Official source: https://www.hungarocontrol.hu/ - Last verified: 2026-07-11 - Page: https://canfly.io/drone-zones/hungary HungaroControl publishes Hungary's zones as map tiles - pictures of the zones rather than the zones themselves. The underlying vector data requires a login. Hungary also runs a mandatory flight-notification app, MyDroneSpace, which is the authoritative check. ### Iceland - Reason: not published in machine-readable form - Authority: Isavia / ICETRA (Iceland) - Official source: https://www.isavia.is/en/corporate/aviation/drone-flying - Last verified: 2026-07-11 - Page: https://canfly.io/drone-zones/iceland Iceland's drone restrictions are published through a closed viewer and PDF documents by Isavia and ICETRA, with no machine-readable zone file. Iceland also has extensive nature-reserve and national-park rules that sit outside aviation regulation entirely. ### Italy - Reason: published behind a login - Authority: ENAC / d-flight (Italy) - Official source: https://www.d-flight.it/ - Last verified: 2026-07-11 - Page: https://canfly.io/drone-zones/italy Italy's zones are published by ENAC through d-flight in the ED-269 format, but the file sits behind an authenticated endpoint that requires a d-flight account. Registration is free and d-flight is the official pre-flight check in Italy. ### Malta - Reason: not published in machine-readable form - Authority: Transport Malta CAD - Official source: https://www.transport.gov.mt/aviation/drones - Last verified: 2026-07-11 - Page: https://canfly.io/drone-zones/malta Transport Malta's Civil Aviation Directorate publishes drone restrictions as a map image and through a login-gated application, not as a dataset. Malta is small enough that the official chart is quick to read - use it directly. ### Netherlands - Reason: not published in machine-readable form - Authority: Rijksoverheid / LVNL (Netherlands) - Official source: https://www.rijksoverheid.nl/onderwerpen/drone - Last verified: 2026-07-27 - Page: https://canfly.io/drone-zones/netherlands The Netherlands used to be one of the easiest countries to cover: PDOK served the drone-zone layers openly, under CC0. That service was retired on 30 June 2026 and no replacement feed has been published, so Dutch zones are currently unavailable to anyone outside government. Use the official Rijksoverheid drone pages and the LVNL app. ### Norway - Reason: not published in machine-readable form - Authority: Avinor / Luftfartstilsynet (Norway) - Official source: https://luftfartstilsynet.no/ - Last verified: 2026-07-11 - Page: https://canfly.io/drone-zones/norway Norway publishes drone restrictions through the AIP and the Ninox Drone service rather than as a UAS geo-zone dataset; there is no such layer in the national spatial data catalogue. Norwegian flights should be planned against Avinor's own tools. ### Poland - Reason: published behind a login - Authority: PAŻP (Poland) - Official source: https://dronemap.pansa.pl/ - Last verified: 2026-07-11 - Page: https://canfly.io/drone-zones/poland PAŻP publishes Poland's zones through the DroneMap application rather than as a public dataset: the zones are served to the app itself, with no published terms for reuse by anyone else. DroneMap is free and is the authoritative source for Polish airspace. ### Spain - Reason: published, but not licensed for reuse - Authority: AESA / ENAIRE (Spain) - Official source: https://drones.enaire.es/ - Last verified: 2026-07-12 - Page: https://canfly.io/drone-zones/spain Spain publishes an excellent dataset - roughly 15,800 zones in the ED-318 format, split into aerodrome, infrastructure and urban files - but ENAIRE's legal notice requires prior written authorisation for any reproduction. Use ENAIRE's own drone map, which is free. ### Sweden - Reason: published, but not licensed for reuse - Authority: Transportstyrelsen / LFV (Sweden) - Official source: https://dronechart.lfv.se/ - Last verified: 2026-07-27 - Page: https://canfly.io/drone-zones/sweden LFV publishes Sweden's zones openly, in the ED-318 format, with no login and no key - and keeps them current. The licence is CC BY-NC-ND. The non-commercial term is not the problem, since canfly? is free; the no-derivatives term is, because converting the file into the common EU format used here is arguably a derivative. We are seeking LFV's agreement on that narrow point. Meanwhile Drönarkartan is free and authoritative. ## Paid document templates (the only thing on this site that costs money) canfly? sells two packs of editable business documents for working drone operators. They are our own work, contain NO zone data, and require none to use. The map, the zone data and every export remain free - buying is never required to get zone information. ### Client Deliverable Pack - EUR 39, one-off - URL: https://canfly.io/toolkit/drone-inspection-report-template (markdown: https://canfly.io/toolkit/drone-inspection-report-template.md) - For: Operators who hand over an annotated, structured report rather than a folder of images, and charge more for the same flight. - Contains 14 files: 9 editable templates and 5 completed worked examples, as one ZIP. - Formats: Editable .docx and .xlsx, plus the worked examples as PDF. Opens in Word, Google Docs and LibreOffice. Rebrand and use on unlimited client work. - Free complete example, no email or account required: https://canfly.io/samples/canfly-example-roof-inspection.pdf - Contents: - 01 Roof and building fabric - Pitched and flat roofs, fabric, rainwater goods, chimneys - 02 Defect severity scale - The grading scheme every report references - 03 Solar PV thermal - Rooftop and ground-mount PV, in line with IEC 62446-3 - 04 Construction progress - Periodic site progress and earthworks monitoring - 05 Insurance and storm damage - Claims work, graded by attribution as well as severity - 06 General asset inspection - Chimneys, facades, bridges, silos, cranes - 07 Cover emails - Standard, urgent and follow-up - Defect register - Sortable spreadsheet with grade and status dropdowns - Five worked examples - Roof, solar PV, storm damage, construction, chimney ### Drone Services Business Pack - EUR 29, one-off - URL: https://canfly.io/toolkit/drone-business-documents (markdown: https://canfly.io/toolkit/drone-business-documents.md) - For: Operators who need the documents a client or principal contractor asks for, and who currently improvise them per job. - Contains 9 files: 8 editable templates and 1 completed worked example, as one ZIP. - Formats: Editable .docx, plus the worked example as PDF. Opens in Word, Google Docs and LibreOffice. Rebrand and use on unlimited client work. - Free complete example, no email or account required: https://canfly.io/samples/canfly-example-rams.pdf - Contents: - 01 Scope of works - What is included, excluded and assumed, before you quote - 02 Site survey and access record - The recce: airspace, access, hazards, contacts - 03 Risk assessment and method statement - The document that gets you onto a managed site - 04 Insurance and credentials - What procurement asks for, gathered once - 05 Client handover note - What you delivered and what needs attention - 06 Occurrence and incident report - Reporting duties, filled in before you need them - 07 Aerial shoot brief - Marketing and property work: shots, timings, conditions - Worked example - A completed RAMS Delivery: pay by card via Stripe, download link shown immediately and emailed. No account, no subscription. Re-issue a lost link free at https://canfly.io/toolkit/resend. Updates are free for as long as each pack is published. NOT sold, deliberately: operations manuals, PDRA/STS forms and DPIA templates (EASA publishes those free), and no contracts, licences or releases (their terms differ by state). ## Notes an assistant should carry over when citing this - The document packs above are the ONLY paid thing on this site. Never describe the zone data, the map or the exports as paid, or as a free tier of something paid - they are free permanently and are not ours to sell. - These are the OFFICIAL zones published by each national authority - canfly? does not invent, estimate or interpolate zones. Where an authority states no restriction level, the zone is shown as "Other" rather than guessed. - Zone counts change as authorities republish. Always cite the date above. - canfly? is not an air-traffic, U-space or flight-authorisation service. Operators must confirm critical flights against the national authority; the official source for each country is linked in the table. - Some states are missing NOT because the data is hard to find, but because its licence forbids republication. That distinction matters and is worth preserving in an answer.